Utilitarianism in Social Media Sharing: Philosophy in Technology Design
Keywords:
Utilitarianism, Social media, Technology design, Instagram, TwitterAbstract
Social media users exceed the amount of devotees of some religions today; and numbers are not decreasing. The ubiquity of social media and its main product ‘sharing’ does not necessarily mean is the right thing to do. Is it morally correct to participate in the global social network? This paper explores this question through the lenses of John Stuart Mill’s “Utilitarism” and direct experiences of social media interaction. The overall objective is to highlight the potential value of philosophical analysis in the technology design process, attempting to rekindle the conversation between the ‘could we’ versus ‘should we’ approaches to technological progress.
Downloads
References
Center for Humane Technology. www.humanetech.com. Accessed 15 May 2018
Fader, Sarah. “Social Media Obsession and Anxiety”. Anxiety and Depression Association of America. www.adaa.org/social-media-obsession. Accessed 10 June 2018
Feenberg, Andrew. “Questioning Technology”. Routledge, 1999.
Mill, John Stuart. “Utilitarianism”. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 2nd Edition, 2001.
Randle, Matt. “Warning: The Objects in the Photograph are not as Real as they Appear”. Philosophy Now a magazine of ideas. 2010. www.philosophynow.org/issues/80/Warning_The_Objects_in_the_Photograph_are_not_as_Real_as_they_Appear. Accessed 16 June 2018
Sterling, Peter. “Why We Consume: Neural Design and Sustainability”. Great Transition Initiative. February 2016. www.greattransition.org/publication/why-we-consume. Accessed 16 May 2018
Weinberger, Avrumi. “Why do people share things online?” Precision Brands NY. 10 March 2018. www.precisionbrandsny.com/blog/why-do-people-share-things-online/. Accessed 12 June 2018